Lawyers of Philippine Airlines (PAL) will study their next legal move after Pasay RTC Judge Maria Rosario Ragasa denied the airline’s petition for an extension of a Temporary Restraining Order seeking to remove protesters blocking the entrances of its Inflight Center.
PAL management views as “highly unfortunate” Judge Ragasa’s order denying PAL’s request for TRO extension based on her assessment that PAL allegedly failed to prove that protesting former PAL employees were hampering the airline’s operations.
PAL lawyers presented sworn testimonies and photos of protesters hampering the flow of operations by setting up illegal checkpoints and barricades and subjecting PAL employees, its service providers and company vehicles to various forms of harassment. Since the wildcat strike of former PAL workers on September 27, 2011, PAL has not been able to use its Inflight Center due to the illegal encampment of its separated employees.
PAL management views as “highly unfortunate” Judge Ragasa’s order denying PAL’s request for TRO extension based on her assessment that PAL allegedly failed to prove that protesting former PAL employees were hampering the airline’s operations.
PAL lawyers presented sworn testimonies and photos of protesters hampering the flow of operations by setting up illegal checkpoints and barricades and subjecting PAL employees, its service providers and company vehicles to various forms of harassment. Since the wildcat strike of former PAL workers on September 27, 2011, PAL has not been able to use its Inflight Center due to the illegal encampment of its separated employees.
No comments:
Post a Comment